約 5,640,188 件
https://w.atwiki.jp/fieds_labo2/pages/71.html
NOD32 Ver4.0 2012/05現在 iTunes10.6とiOS5.1だとデバイス認識はOKになりました。 よかったーw NODの問題じゃないですねー、これw iTunesでiPod Touchが認識できなくなりました。 カメラデバイスとしては認識してるので、ソフト的な問題かなーと。 iTunesを再インストールして10.5にしたりしたけど、すぐにまた認識しなくなったので、いろいろ見てると、NOD32の問題っぽいです。ちょうどNOS32を更新したタイミングだったので、どこに問題があるのか不明な状態に＠＠； Windows版日本語の最新は4.2（2011/10/28現在） 本家はVer5 iTunesと相性あり。Ver5では解決済みらしい。 以下、前回嵌ったのに、またやっちゃったのでメモ＠＠；iOSアップデート時は、保護機能をOFFにしておかないと、ダウンロード完了間際にタイムアウトエラーが発生し、更新できない。ウィルス・スパイウェア対策を無効にする リアルタイムファイルシステム保護を無効にする 保護機能ONのまま、設定で除外すればOK? NOD32の更新後、iTunesがiPod Touchを接続しても認識しない。iTunesの再インストールを行うと、認識するが、すぐに再発する。 設定で除外する？ で、保護機能をOFFにしたら、一度バックアップできました。 その後は、保護機能ONにして、除外設定をいろいろとしてるのですが、認識しません。 OFFにしてももうだめだし、なんで？＠＠； わかんないよー（；＿；） 4.0＝＞4.2にすればいいのかな？ XP終了フラグなのかなー？ とりあえず、iTunes再インストールで認識したので、アップデート中。 毎回再インストールとかダルイですｈ NOD32を使用するとiOSのVerUPができない問題対応について 僕のPCでiTunesが重いわけ ESET Nod32 Antivirus4 設定のまとめメモ NOD32などのウイルス対策ソフトが入っているWindows上で、iTunesが異常に重くなる現象の解決方法
https://w.atwiki.jp/pipopipo555jp/pages/2928.html
WikiLeaks Japan North Korea Collapse?; ‘Going Nuclear’; UN Security Council http //blogs.wsj.com/japanrealtime/2010/11/30/wikileaks-japan-north-korea-collapse-going-nuclear-un-security-council/ This is the latest roundup of Japan mentions in a series of JRT posts pulled from the WikiLeaks U.S. embassy cables series relating to Japan. ― From a February 22, 2010, cable classified as “secret” from the U.S. embassy in Seoul summarizing a Feb. 17 conversation between U.S. Ambassador to South Korea Kathleen Stephens and Vice Foreign Minister Chun Yung-woo on Sino-North Korean relations Chun argued that, in the event of a North Korean collapse, China would clearly “not welcome” any U.S. military presence north of the DMZ. XXXXXXXXXXXX Chun XXXXXXXXXXXX said the PRC would be comfortable with a reunified Korea controlled by Seoul and anchored to the United States in a “benign alliance” — as long as Korea was not hostile towards China. Tremendous trade and labor-export opportunities for Chinese companies, Chun said, would also help salve PRC concerns about living with a reunified Korea. Chun dismissed the prospect of a possible PRC military intervention in the event of a DPRK collapse, noting that China’s strategic economic interests now lie with the United States, Japan, and South Korea — not North Korea. Moreover, Chun argued, bare-knuckle PRC military intervention in a DPRK internal crisis could “strengthen the centrifugal forces in China’s minority areas.” On Japan-South Korea relations Chun acknowledged the Ambassador’s point that a strong ROK-Japan relationship would help Tokyo accept a reunified Korean Peninsula under Seoul’s control. Chun asserted that, even though “Japan’s preference” was to keep Korea divided, Tokyo lacked the leverage to stop reunification in the event the DPRK collapses. ― From a June 17, 2009, cable classified as “confidential” from the U.S. embassy in Beijing summarizing a June 16 discussion with an unidentified source about Asian affairs related to North Korea XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX told the Charge that he kept abreast of Western media reports about North Korea. XXXXXXXXXXXX cautioned that U.S. experts should not assume North Korea would implode after Kim Jong-il’s death. He said that PRC analysts concluded that the regime would still function normally and discounted strongly any suggestion that the system would collapse once Kim Jong-il disappeared. ROK has no new ideas - Japan can only scuttle talks XXXXXXXXXXXX said that ROK Six-Party Talks envoy Wi Sung-lac had met with VFM Wu Dawei on June 9 but had offered nothing new. “The South Koreans have plenty of ideas, but we’ve heard them all before,” he complained, adding that the ROK government was too close to the situation in North Korea to be objective. Turning to Japan, XXXXXXXXXXXX said that Japan’s obsession with the abductee issue reminded him of a Chinese expression for an individual who was too weak to make something work, yet strong enough to destroy it. ― From a January 12, 2009, cable classified as “confidential” from the U.S. embassy in Seoul summarizing South Korea’s foreign policy towards its neighbors President Lee has made concerted efforts to improve relations with Tokyo, which were significantly strained during the Roh Moo-hyun era over history and territory issues. Lee sought to compartmentalize what he called “disputes over the past,” stating in an early policy address that “South Korea and Japan should…try to foster a future-oriented relationship with a pragmatic attitude. Historical truth must not be ignored, but we can no longer afford to give up our future relations due to disputes over the past.” Lee’s vision was to look beyond the history-bound bilateral issues and create a Korea-Japan partnership active in the regional and global arena on issues like the denuclearization of the DPRK, strengthening of multilateral relationships, trade and economics, and cooperation on projects like alternative energy, communicable diseases, and poverty alleviation. So far, Lee’s efforts have yielded some success, although Blue House officials would argue that results would have been far better had Tokyo shown more courage, especially in dealing with the Takeshima/Dokdo issue [refers to the territorial disputed group of islands in the Sea of Japan. It is called Takeshima in Japan and Dokdo in South Korea]. For example, Lee pressed ahead with his plan to engage Japan on a more strategic regional and global level. Lee made the decision that Korea would participate in the October U.S.-Japan-Korea Trilateral Policy Planning talks (Ref A) in Tokyo. He then agreed to the U.S.-Japan-Korea Defense Trilateral Talks (Ref B) in Washington in November, the first trilateral defense talks in six years. Lee also initiated the first ever stand-alone China-Japan-Korea Trilateral Summit (Ref C) in Fukuoka in December. Critics will of course point out that there were no substantive results from these meetings, but the fact that the meetings were held at all is a significant result. ― From a April 30, 2009, cable classified as “secret” from the U.S. embassy in Beijing. The “Charge” refers to Dan Piccuta, who was chargé d’affaires of the U.S. embassy in Beijing at the time of the correspondence In the first two G-20 Financial Summits, U.S. and Chinese positions had been close, closer even than the United States and Europe, XXXXXXXXXXXX noted. Views on major issues such as the need for fiscal stimulus and reform of international financial institutions were similar. Leading up to the London Summit, XXXXXXXXXXXX felt that the U.S.-U.K.-China “troika” had been effective Beijing could persuade the developing countries, Washington could influence Japan and South Korea, and London could bring along the Europeans. And further down the cable , related to overhauling the United Nations Security Council, a prospect that could mean adding to the current roster of five permanent (P-5) members, which currently includes the U.S., Russia, China, the U.K. and France China was concerned by “momentum” that was building on UN Security Council reform, which was “not good” for the P-5, XXXXXXXXXXXX said. China wanted the United States to maintain its position on UNSC reform and not be “proactive” on the matter, which the PRC feared could result in a UN General Assembly resolution on the subject. The P-5 “club” should not be “diluted,” XXXXXXXXXXXX said. If we end up with a “P-10,” both China and the United States would “be in trouble.” Moreover, it would be difficult for the Chinese public to accept Japan as a permanent member of the UNSC. The Charge replied that the Administration had not completed its policy review on UNSC expansion, so we do not yet have a position on specific proposals. Nonetheless, the United States believed that UN members should be allowed to state their positions freely and openly without undue P-5 influence. Regarding Japan, the Charge said that, while no decision had been made about which countries to support for permanent membership on the UNSC, it was hard to envision any expansion of the Council that did not include Japan, which was the second-largest contributor to the UN budget. ― From a June 4, 2009, cable classified as “secret” from the embassy in Singapore summarizing a May 30 discussion between U.S. Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg’s conversation with Singapore founder and former prime minister Lee Kuan Yew, who now goes by the title minister mentor The Deputy Secretary noted that North Korea’s decisions will have an impact in Japan. MM Lee said he believes Japan may well “go nuclear.” The Chinese must have factored this into their calculations and concluded that the prospect of Japan with nuclear weapons is less bad than losing North Korea as a buffer state. The Chinese take a long-term view and must think that within a few years the DPRK’s current leadership will be gone and there will be new leadership, with new thinking. But there will still be a North Korea, he said. ウィキリークス情報
https://w.atwiki.jp/memcache/pages/56.html
Java Security Framework .NET Framework Membership FrameworkWindows Azure Link Java Security Framework Apache Shiro (本家) Apache Shiroの紹介 (IBM) .NET Framework Membership Framework Windows Azure Custom Basic 認証による WCF REST サービスをクラウドに配置する (松崎 剛 Blog) Link
https://w.atwiki.jp/gtasa-vehicles/pages/110.html
Securicar 概要 車種：現金輸送車 和音：セキュリカー ドア：4枚 乗員：4名 駆動：RWD 実車：インターナショナル･ハーベスター Sシリーズ 性能 重量：7,000 kg 最高速：170 km/h 加速度：15.0 m/s2 解説 現金や貴重品を輸送する車。 社名入りのものはChuff SecurityのものとLock Load Securityのものがある。 性能としては、加速は悪いもののそこそこ速度が出る。横転しても立ち直りがききやすい。 GTAⅢから長らく同じモデルだったが、今作からはGTAⅣやⅤに登場する現金輸送車の先代モデルとでも言えるようなデザインになった。 残念ながらこの車には装甲は施されておらず、M4ライフル26発であえなく炎上してしまう。そのためギャング戦争のお供には不向きだろう。 この車は不思議な耐久性をしており、CJが乗った状態なら頑丈な大型車とも渡り合えるが、誰も乗っていない、又はNPC運転の場合だと、数回の衝突ですぐに炎上してしまう。 GTAⅤでは、Stockadeに名前が変更。Securicarの名は消失してしまった。 GTA3 モデル インターナショナル･ハーベスター Sシリーズ
https://w.atwiki.jp/bemani2dp/pages/3831.html
GENRE TITLE ARTIST bpm notes CLEAR RATE TECHNO TECHNO Style Essentials BEMANI Sound Team "SETUP from Berlin" 154 1506 n%(yyyy/mm/dd) 攻略・コメント initiationを半分に希釈したような譜面。終盤は押しにくい同時押し混じりの16分三連をひたすら処理する。ハイパーの爽快感はどこへやら… -- 名無しさん (2019-11-08 20 51 05) 中盤の1p側に降ってくるトリルがやっかい -- 名無しさん (2019-11-08 21 32 01) 中盤のトリルが異様にBADハマりしやすい。何故 -- 名無しさん (2019-11-14 21 01 52) 名前 コメント
https://w.atwiki.jp/buy-doujin/pages/90.html
サークル名：ESSENTIA 作家名：藤真拓哉 ホームページ：ESSENTIA
https://w.atwiki.jp/fieds_labo2/pages/101.html
ESET ESET 旧名称NOD32です。 法人向けライセンス (PDF) Windows2000、XPモードサポート、OSX版があります。
https://w.atwiki.jp/fspcba/pages/10.html
Overview As a qualified PCB designer, you must understand the schematic diagram. If necessary, FS Tech recommends that you divide it into more detail according to the function of the circuit, such as analog, digital, high speed, high current, power supply, etc. Component placement considerations Placement of high-speed equipment 1. High-speed devices are prohibited from being placed on the edge of the PCB. As we all know, high-speed equipment is a relatively sensitive instrument, and the edge of the bare board has different impedance characteristics, which will cause serious damage to the electromagnetic interference machine. It is said that there have been some turnkey PCB manufacturers in the past and this has resulted in radiated EMI from the connectors of the PCB. Therefore, FS Technology generally places sensitive high-speed devices in the center of the bare board, in this way to reduce the adverse effects of EMI. In past manufacturing experience, we believe this is the best approach. Thermal effect placement strategy For PCB component placement, thermal effects are a factor that we must consider. When manufacturing high-speed circuit boards, the production equipment will be in a high temperature state due to the influence of the rotational speed. When the temperature of manufacturing equipment reaches a critical point, the pins of PCB components will be damaged. To keep your thermal components cool, develop a sensible placement strategy. In order to deal with this problem, FS Technology will move the components away from the air path of the BGA when installing large components. This method effectively prevents the components from directly facing the hot air flow, so as to achieve the effect of cooling. Process for placing components Prioritize the location of the connector The size of the PCBA board depends on the product housing, so prior to PCB design, the location of the connector is prioritized. Note Here is the PCBA board instead of the bare PCB board. There are essential differences between the two. If you don t know much about this, you can read the article of FS Technology s PCB vs PCBA. Chip placement Place the main functional chips such as microcontrollers, operational amplifiers, drivers, and power chips. These chips are the heart of the entire PCBA, and they determine the functionality of your board. We recommend that you place auxiliary components such as crystals and decoupling capacitors close to the relevant main chip. Place passive components Passive components include the following types series resistors, pull-up resistors, ESD diodes, etc. There are many points to pay attention to when placing passive components. In order to help you to carry out PCB assembly smoothly, FS Technology lists the following points Voltage and current levels Function type (analog, digital, power, high speed) placed to facilitate the flow of high currents to minimize loops Power and GND Distribution In addition to circuit function, voltage and current levels should also be considered. Circuits with similar VCC and GND should be grouped and placed together as shown in Figure (4). Different functional sections are prioritized and placed. Most critical in order of priority Wireless Wi-Fi, GPS digital motor control power supply Place the main components according to the signal flow. Refer to the circuit schematic when placing components. Identify the main components of the circuit, such as microprocessors, Ethernet chips, memories, etc. Place these according to the floor plan and use the shortest possible traces between these master chips according to the datasheet guidelines, which makes the signal flow as smooth and unidirectional as possible. Follow FS Technology Blog, you will be able to learn more pcb assembly process steps.
https://w.atwiki.jp/mrfrtech/pages/83.html
Market Synopsis Market Research Future (MRFR) conducted study on the Identity as a Service Market Segments 2020 and detailed insights into the effect of COVID pandemic on the market in the report. According to MRFR analysis, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market can rise at 18.4% CAGR across the forecast period. By 2027, the identity as a service (IDaaS) market value can cross USD 10 Bn. The growing deployment of IDaaS on largely accepted cloud platform can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market across the review period. The increase in the adoption of SaaS-based IAM offerings that allow organizations to use single sign-on (SSO) via OpenID Connect (OIDC) or Security Assertion Markup Language (SAML) for the authentication and access controls to provide secured access to enterprises SaaS applications can promote the expansion of the world market of IDaaS. The growing need to curb on-site infrastructure that can support a wide range of integration options can boost the expansion of the IDaaS market. The rise in the level of interconnectivity as IoT and BYOD culture are trending across different verticals can bolster the expansion of the IDaaS market. Rise in IDaaS vendors can also benefit the global market. The high utility of DevSecOps practices for the identification and access management in organizations can fuel the expansion of the market growth. The growing concerns of companies regarding data security limit is pressing the need for IDaaS solutions that can promote the expansion of the global identity as a service (IDaaS) market in the years to come. The rise in preference for on-premise access management systems can pose threat to the IDaaS market. Request a Free Sample @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/sample_request/7928 Market Segmentation The segments study of the global IDaaS market is based on deployment, service, organization size, and vertical. The service-based, the global IDaaS market segments are access, identity governance administration, and intelligence. The organization size based, the global IDaaS market segments are large enterprise and small- and medium-sized enterprise (SME). The deployment based, the global IDaaS market segments are public cloud, private cloud, and hybrid. The vertical based, the global IDaaS market segments are BFSI, retail and CPG, manufacturing, energy and utilities, transportation, healthcare and life sciences, and government and defense among others. Regional Analysis North America IDaaS market is expected to secure the highest global market size in the forecast period. Led by the US, the market in North America can rise exponentially due to the early adoption of DevSecOps that aids in the identification and allows access to management and strict government directives associated with data protection. The increase in cyber threats and high growing demand for potential and powerful authentication solutions on cloud can drive the IDaaS market in North America. In Asia Pacific, the IDaaS market can expand rapidly in evaluation period. The growing BYOD trend and increase in IoT applications across verticals and increase in the awareness among enterprises regarding security issues can promote the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region. APAC is observed to hold high growth prospects, thus the expansion of the IDaaS market in the Asia Pacific region is expected to rise substantially. Key Players MRFR identified some notable players of the global IDaaS market. They are; Okta, Inc. (US), Avatier (US), OneLogin, Inc (US), Fischer Identity (US), Microsoft Corporation, (US), Oracle Corporation (US), Centrify Corporation (US), Ping Identity (US), iWelcome (Netherlands), empowerID (US),VMWare (US), LoginRadius (Canada), IDaptive, LLC. (US), Ubisecure, Inc. (Finland), Sailpoint (US), Optimal IdM(US), Bitium, Inc. (US), and others. These players are recognized by origin, regional presence, recent key innovations, industry expertise, and product diversification. Access Report Details @ https //www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/identity-service-market-7928 Table of Contents 1 Executive Summary 2 Scope of The Report 2.1 Market Definition 2.2 Scope of The Study 2.2.1 Research Objectives 2.2.2 Assumptions Limitations 2.3 Markets Structure 3 Market Research Methodology 3.1 Research Process 3.2 Secondary Research 3.3 Primary Research 3.4 Forecast Model Continued… Similar Report B2B Telecommunication Market Forensic Accounting Market Trending #MRFR Report** https //ictmrfr.blogspot.com/2022/04/geofencing-market-companies-growth-with.html https //blogfreely.net/pranali004/telecom-expense-management-market-size-impressive-cagr-changing-business-scope https //postheaven.net/pranali004/financial-app-industry-impressive-cagr-changing-business-needs-scope-of https //market-research-future.tribe.so/post/openstack-service-market-research-impressive-cagr-changing-scope-of-current--6263de46791566c10c79891e https //www.scutify.com/articles/2022-04-24-infrastructure-as-a-service-industry-cagr-changing-business-scope-of-current-and-future-industry- About Market Research Future At Market Research Future (MRFR), we enable our customers to unravel the complexity of various industries through our Cooked Research Report (CRR), Half-Cooked Research Reports (HCRR), Raw Research Reports (3R), Continuous-Feed Research (CFR), and Market Research Consulting Services. Contact Market Research Future (Part of Wantstats Research and Media Private Limited) 99 Hudson Street, 5Th Floor New York, NY 10013 United States of America 1 628 258 0071 (US) 44 2035 002 764 (UK) Email sales@marketresearchfuture.com Website https //www.marketresearchfuture.com
https://w.atwiki.jp/gruppe6/
Gruppe Sechs securityⒼ⑥ グルッぺ・ゼクスⒼ⑥に関する情報を提供するwikiです。 注意--Ⓖ⑥ではGTA5内にあるグルッぺ・ゼクスと合わせた上、有人の隊員(プレイヤー)達が作った会社を指します。 入隊希望 隊員紹介 マーケット 集会場所_拠点マップ 活動内容 主に施設の警備や要人護衛、治安維持などさまざまな活動をしている 警備車両 以下↓の車両は警備車両及び護衛車両に使用されています。ここでは一部抜粋して紹介します。 グレンジャー3600LX(Granger 3600LX) 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/2724.html アリューシャン(Aleutian) 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/3056.html カヴァルケードXL(Cavalcade XL) https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/3070.html バッファローSTX(Buffalo STX) 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/2722.html チンクエミーラ(Cinquemila) 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/2727.html ストッケード （Stockade） 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/405.html スタニアーLEクルーザー(Stanier LE Cruiser) Gruppe仕様 車両の詳細は下のURLから↓ https //w.atwiki.jp/gtav/pages/3063.html ※当wikiは非公式のwikiです。情報の妥当性や正確性について保証するものではなく、一切の責任を負いかねます。 ※当wikiを利用することによって生じるいかなる損害も当サイトでは補償致しません。 ※ご利用につきましては自己責任となりますのでご注意ください。 ※また、当wikiおよびwiki管理人はGTA5の運営様(ロックスター)とは一切関係がありません。wiki管理人にエラーなどについて問い合わせないようお願いします。 ゲームに関する問い合わせに関してはこちらから